
The top 15 revenue-generating crypto projects captured 56.02% of the $3.40 billion total tracked across all non-stablecoin-issuer projects between January 1 and September 15, 2026. Hyperliquid leads by a wide margin, generating $429.04 million YTD, 12.62% of the entire pool and more than the next two highest earners combined.
Hyperliquid and Pump.fun together account for $751.25 million, or 22.10% of all 2026 revenue tracked. Pump.fun's $322.21 million comes almost entirely from token-creation and trading fees on its memecoin launchpad on Solana.
An interesting finding is the #3 and #5 revenue generators, Axiom Pro and GMGN, which are not on-chain or DeFi protocols per se, but trading terminals that provide easier access to on-chain trading. Axiom is commonly used to trade perpetuals and notably integrates Hyperliquid for its perps functions. GMGN, by contrast, is built around Solana memecoin trading, capturing fee revenue tied to the same speculative activity that fuels Pump.fun.
Axiom, is commonly used to trade perpetuals and notably partners with Hyperliquid for its perps functions. GMGN on the other hand, is more focused towards memecoin trading and shares its success with Pump.fun.
The top 15 projects span a diverse range of sectors without any noticeable dominant sector: 2 perps, 1 launchpad, 3 trading terminals, 2 stablecoin issuers, 1 RWA, 1 prediction market, 1 MEV builder, 1 collectibles platform, 1 wallet, 1 payments, 1 lending protocol, and 1 DEX.
Top 15 Crypto Revenue Generators, 2026 YTD (Jan 1–Sep 15)
|
Rank |
Project |
Type |
2026 YTD Revenue |
% of $3.40B Total |
|
1 |
Hyperliquid |
Perps |
$429.04M |
12.62% |
|
2 |
Pump.fun |
Launchpad |
$322.21M |
9.48% |
|
3 |
Axiom Pro |
Trading Terminal |
$132.09M |
3.89% |
|
4 |
Sky |
Stablecoin Issuer |
$129.87M |
3.82% |
|
5 |
GMGN |
Trading Terminal |
$126.03M |
3.71% |
|
6 |
Polymarket |
Prediction Market |
$115.48M |
3.40% |
|
7 |
World Liberty Financial |
Stablecoin Issuer |
$95.37M |
2.81% |
|
8 |
Paxos |
RWA |
$87.93M |
2.59% |
|
9 |
edgeX |
Perps |
$84.37M |
2.48% |
|
10 |
Titan Builder |
MEV |
$83.47M |
2.46% |
|
11 |
Collector Crypt |
Collectibles |
$72.82M |
2.14% |
|
12 |
Phantom |
Wallet |
$60.05M |
1.77% |
|
13 |
Aave |
Crypto Lending |
$56.81M |
1.67% |
|
14 |
fomo |
Payments |
$54.66M |
1.61% |
|
15 |
Aerodrome |
DEX |
$54.31M |
1.60% |
The top 15 projects above account for 56.02% of the $3.40 billion total tracked across all non-stablecoin-issuer projects in 2026 YTD.
Crypto Revenues Remain Consistent Despite the Current Bear Market

Crypto's monthly revenue across all tracked projects, including Tether and Circle peaked at $1.57B in January 2025. The market has averaged $1.08B/month across the first eight full months of 2026 (January–August), an 11.68% decline but still considered impressive given that BTC declined by almost 40% in the same period.
Monthly Revenue Trend, Year-over-Year Comparison
|
Period |
Monthly Average Revenue |
Change |
|
2024 (full year) |
$0.84B |
— |
|
2025 (full year) |
$1.22B |
+45.51% vs. 2024 |
|
2026 (Jan–Aug) |
$1.08B |
-11.68% vs. 2025 full-year avg |
|
2026 (Jan–Aug) vs. 2025 (Jan–Aug) |
$1.08B vs. $1.20B |
-10.14% |
Methodology
Chart 1 (Top 15 Revenue Generators): Covers January 1–September 15, 2026. The $3.40 billion total and top-15 rankings exclude Tether and Circle on the basis of scale as both would dwarf every other entry and obscure differentiation among the remaining projects, not because their revenue model is illegitimate. Grayscale, which would otherwise rank #3 by revenue ($154.14M), is also excluded from the top-15 rankings as the sole TradFi asset manager in the dataset (its revenue is an AUM-based sponsor fee rather than a usage-based protocol fee); Aerodrome (rank #16 by revenue) fills the 15th slot in its place.
Chart 2 (Monthly Revenue Trend): Covers all tracked projects, including Tether and Circle, from inception (March 2018, charted from January 2020) through September 15, 2026. September 2026 is a partial month (15 of 30 days) and is excluded from all monthly-average and YoY calculations to avoid understating 2026's pace.
Category labels applied to individual projects (e.g., "trading terminal," "launchpad," "stablecoin issuer") are a manual, best-effort classification rather than a formal taxonomy, and some entries involve judgment calls: Pump.fun is treated as a launchpad rather than a DEX since token creation, not swapping, drives its fees; World Liberty Financial is treated as a stablecoin issuer (its USD1 product) despite also offering lending-adjacent products.
On-chain revenue is our primary criterion for inclusion in this list. Some entries, particularly stablecoin issuers like Paxos and World Liberty Financial, generate revenue off-chain (largely interest income on reserves) rather than through on-chain transaction fees. We have kept them in the rankings since their figures come from the same public data sources (DefiLlama) as the rest of the list, but the distinction is worth noting for readers comparing them against usage-based protocols.
If you cite these insights, we would appreciate a link credit to this article on CoinGecko, which allows us to keep supplying you with useful data-led content.
This study is for illustrative and informational purposes only, and is not financial advice.